<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy Isn&#8217;t Dead&#8230;But It&#8217;s On Life Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelbromleyonline.com/index.php/2009/04/17/privacy-isnt-deadbut-its-on-life-support/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelbromleyonline.com/index.php/2009/04/17/privacy-isnt-deadbut-its-on-life-support/</link>
	<description>The future is already here...you just don't know about it yet.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ApplyCreditCards</title>
		<link>http://michaelbromleyonline.com/index.php/2009/04/17/privacy-isnt-deadbut-its-on-life-support/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>ApplyCreditCards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelbromley.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hi, cool post. I have been wondering about this topic,so thanks for writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, cool post. I have been wondering about this topic,so thanks for writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bromley</title>
		<link>http://michaelbromleyonline.com/index.php/2009/04/17/privacy-isnt-deadbut-its-on-life-support/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bromley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelbromley.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Nic, 

That's a really great point.  Though if privacy is a recent social construct then it's imminent death is still likely, just less critical.  However, like most things that eventually come back around to a "retro" version there will be differences.  Back in the caves you knew everyone in your clan but not the other clans (in fact you likely fought with the other clans) but going forward I think we'll be transparent to people we don't know or necessarily like.   Thats the part that scared people and that we'll have to adjust to.   Should be interesting, thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic, </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a really great point.  Though if privacy is a recent social construct then it&#8217;s imminent death is still likely, just less critical.  However, like most things that eventually come back around to a &#8220;retro&#8221; version there will be differences.  Back in the caves you knew everyone in your clan but not the other clans (in fact you likely fought with the other clans) but going forward I think we&#8217;ll be transparent to people we don&#8217;t know or necessarily like.   Thats the part that scared people and that we&#8217;ll have to adjust to.   Should be interesting, thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Greene</title>
		<link>http://michaelbromleyonline.com/index.php/2009/04/17/privacy-isnt-deadbut-its-on-life-support/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelbromley.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Ever think that privacy is a very modern concept?  Human society used to involve very little privacy - lots of people in one room, only sleeping nooks for the privileged etc.  Everyone you knew knew everything about you (at least superficially).  

I agree that we will move forward on this, to a new concept of privacy, rather than return to the old anonymity - which was actually pretty recent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever think that privacy is a very modern concept?  Human society used to involve very little privacy - lots of people in one room, only sleeping nooks for the privileged etc.  Everyone you knew knew everything about you (at least superficially).  </p>
<p>I agree that we will move forward on this, to a new concept of privacy, rather than return to the old anonymity - which was actually pretty recent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Hoobler</title>
		<link>http://michaelbromleyonline.com/index.php/2009/04/17/privacy-isnt-deadbut-its-on-life-support/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Hoobler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelbromley.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Very True Bromley. Really enjoyed the article!

~Jesse Hoobler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very True Bromley. Really enjoyed the article!</p>
<p>~Jesse Hoobler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
